ON COSMOTECHNICS – for a renewed relation between technology and nature in the anthropocene

September 18, 2017

This talk aims to bring forward a critical reflection on a renewed relation between nature and technology in the anthropocene, by contextualizing the question around the recent debates on the “ontological turn” in Anthropology, which attempts to go beyond the nature and culture dualism analysed as the crisis of modernity. The “politics of ontologies” associated with this movement in anthropology aims to open up the question of participation of non-humans. The talk contrasts this anthropological attempt with the work of the philosopher Gilbert Simondon who wants to overcome the antagonism between culture and technics. This antagonism, according to Simondon, is resulted from the technological rupture of modernity towards the end of the 18th century. It analyses the differences of the oppositions set up in their work: culture vs nature, culture vs technics, to show that a dialogue between anthropology of nature (illustrated through the work of Descola) and philosophy of technology (illustrated through the work of Simondon) will be fruitful to conceptualize a renewed relation between nature and technology. One way to create such a conversation as well as to think about the reconciliation between nature and technology, as this talk tries to show, is to develop the concept of cosmotechnics as the denominator of these two trends of thinking.

Subscribe to our newsletter


Previous Story

“For a Philosophy of Technology in China” interviewed by Geert Lovink

Next Story

Interview of Yuk Hui at COLTA

Latest from Events

Lectures (5th-7th Dec 2022): Incompatible Thought: Legacy and its Recursivity

北藝大博班實驗室2022系列演講II 【不相容的思想:遺產及其遞歸】 許煜訪台系列講座 〖Incompatible Thought: Legacy and its Recursivity〗 時間:2022年12月5日、6日、7日,14:00-17:00 地點:國立臺北藝術大學 基進講堂(圖書館3F,入口位於圖書館正門前石階左側) 講題:〈斯蒂格勒與後歐洲哲學〉、〈何謂亞洲?一個提問〉、〈機器與戰爭〉 報名連結:https://forms.gle/hqojhwcUHYd1HRGV6 (由於場地座位有限,煩請填寫) 「我不會說新的技術思想必然出自亞洲,而非歐洲,但我相信這類新思想只會出現在思想體系之間的不相容,因為兩者間的不相容造就出思想自身的個體化,同時避開從屬與支配關係。然而歐洲是否對此做好了準備?對我來說,再次闡明今天哲學、技術和地緣政治學之間的關係極為重要,然而今天我們仍然缺乏思考。」(21世紀的控制論 –—《遞歸與偶然》 洛文克訪談許煜) “One does not inherit a

Slide Slide Slide Slide Slide Slide Slide
Go toTop