Workshop (20 Nov 2021): Technology and The State: The 200th anniversary of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right

November 4, 2021

Saturday, 20 November 2021
9am-2pm CET / 4pm-9pm HKT
Online event: Register to join via Zoom
Facebook Event

Organisers:
Yuk Hui (City University of Hong Kong)
Gregory S. Moss (Chinese University of Hong Kong)
Milan Stürmer (Leuphana University)

Speakers:
Joel Bock (De Paul University, US)
Anna Winckelmann (Higher School of Economics, RU)
Christoph Görlich (Leuphana University, DE)
Armin Schneider (Humboldt University, DE)
Fernando Wirtz (University of Tübingen, DE)
Anna Longo (Collège International de Philosophie, FR)

One of the subjects that seems to be still under-explored in Hegel’s philosophy is the question of technology. We understand that it is only with the Industrial Revolution that technological consciousness entered into philosophy. Although the Elements of the Philosophy of Right were written in 1821 and Hegel witnessed the use of machinery in factories, the concept of ‘machine’ remains a stereotype opposed to the ‘organic’. Mechanism is presented as something below chemistry and biology in terms of the level of organisation and self-determination of the concept in both the Encyclopedia and Science of Logic, though the concept of ‘absolute mechanism’ can be read as a mechano-organismic structure and operation.

Beyond this opposition between the mechanistic and the organic, which is shared by the romantics and other idealists, there is another dimension of technology irreducible to mechanism. Technology expresses itself as a general tendency of externalisation or alienation (Entäußerung) and the power of negation. Retrospectively, we know that a student of Hegel, Ernst Kapp, developed the concept of organ projection to describe technical inventions in his Grundlinien einer Philosophie der Technik (1877), and that the Hegelian scholar Gotthart Günther characterises Hegel as a proto-cyberneticist or, in other words, cybernetics as realising Hegel’s logic. The question of technology in Hegel is manifold and remains to be clarified. The pandemic announced the return of the state equipped with an advanced automation and surveillance system, one which is simultaneously beyond Hegel’s description in 1821, while making Hegel’s writing appear only more relevant today.

Supported by:
Research Network for Philosophy and Technology
Cosmotechnics Research Unit, City University of Hong Kong

Schedule:

Subscribe to our newsletter


Previous Story

Dialogues on Philosophy and Technology Research Seminar III (24 Nov 2021) Jean-Hugues Barthélémy: Towards Philosophical Relativity

Next Story

Dialogues on Philosophy and Technology Research Seminar IV (7 Dec 2021) Susanna Lindberg: Bernard Stiegler’s Love of Music

Latest from Events

Lectures (5th-7th Dec 2022): Incompatible Thought: Legacy and its Recursivity

北藝大博班實驗室2022系列演講II 【不相容的思想:遺產及其遞歸】 許煜訪台系列講座 〖Incompatible Thought: Legacy and its Recursivity〗 時間:2022年12月5日、6日、7日,14:00-17:00 地點:國立臺北藝術大學 基進講堂(圖書館3F,入口位於圖書館正門前石階左側) 講題:〈斯蒂格勒與後歐洲哲學〉、〈何謂亞洲?一個提問〉、〈機器與戰爭〉 報名連結:https://forms.gle/hqojhwcUHYd1HRGV6 (由於場地座位有限,煩請填寫)   「我不會說新的技術思想必然出自亞洲,而非歐洲,但我相信這類新思想只會出現在思想體系之間的不相容,因為兩者間的不相容造就出思想自身的個體化,同時避開從屬與支配關係。然而歐洲是否對此做好了準備?對我來說,再次闡明今天哲學、技術和地緣政治學之間的關係極為重要,然而今天我們仍然缺乏思考。」(21世紀的控制論 –—《遞歸與偶然》 洛文克訪談許煜) “One does not inherit a

Slide Slide Slide Slide Slide Slide Slide
Go toTop