Dialogues in Philosophy and Technology Research Seminar VI (22 February 2022) Henning Schmidgen: Machinic Normativity

February 10, 2022

Henning Schmidgen: Machinic Normativity
In dialogue with Yuk Hui

Tuesday, 22 February 2022
13:00-15:00 CET / 20:00-22:00 HKT
Online Event: Register to join via Zoom
Facebook Event

In today’s society, technologies are often perceived as helpful and fruitful “modes of existence” that facilitate and improve the lives of their users. At the same time, they are often experienced as limitations and constraints imposed on us by more or less abstract bodies and powers. The use of digital technologies, in particular, is often associated with unclear rules, preconditions, and consequences that limit our capacities for self-determination – and thus also the possibility of normative action. In this situation, it is not only the critique of algorithms, artificial intelligence, and information capitalism that is appropriate and necessary. As I argue, what is also at stake is an extended reflection about “machinic normativity,” i.e., the possibility and capacity for subjective and creative use of technologies.

This talk introduces the idea of machinic normativity by referring to the philosophical tradition of what Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari have called “technological vitalism.” I will show that this tradition includes not just Deleuze and Guattari, but also philosophers and physicians such as Georges Canguilhem and Kurt Goldstein. Crucial to this tradition is a biological perspective on “technique” in which it is understood as synonymous with the possibility of shaping one’s environment. Accordingly, our answer to the question concerning technology depends crucially on actualizing this perspective.

Henning Schmidgen is Professor of Media Studies at the Bauhaus University in Weimar, Germany. He studied psychology, philosophy and linguistics in Berlin and Paris. In 1996, he obtained his PhD in psychology at the Free University Berlin. From 1997 to 2011, he was postdoctoral researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science (Dept. Rheinberger) in Berlin. In 2011, he obtained the Habilitation in history of science and media studies. Between 2011 and 2014 he was professor of media aesthetics at the University of Regensburg.

Bridging the gap between media studies and the history of science, Schmidgen worked extensively on Guattari’s machines, Canguilhem’s concepts, and the problem of time in physiology, psychology, and psychoanalysis. His research is published by journals such as Isis, Configurations, and Grey Room. Among his recent books are The Helmholtz-Curves. Tracing Lost Time (2014), The Guattari Tapes (2019) and Horn, or The Counterside of Media (2022).

About the series

The Dialogues on Philosophy and Technology seminar series is initiated by the Cosmotechnics/Critical AI research project, supported by the City University of Hong Kong in collaboration with the Research Network for Philosophy and Technology. The series running from Fall/Spring 2021/22 features talks and workshops with leading scholars in the philosophy of technology and aims to address urgent questions on philosophy and technology today. 

Upcoming events include seminars in 2022 with Andrew Feenberg (16 March), Luciana Parisi (20 April), and Carl Mitcham (25 May). Follow our Facebook Page or sign-up to our newsletter to stay up-to-date on upcoming events.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Previous Story

Book Talk (16 Feb 2022): Technopolitique du geste contemporain by Román Domínguez Jiménez

Next Story

Book Conversation (10/11 March 2022) Discriminating Data by Wendy Chun

Latest from Events

Lectures (5th-7th Dec 2022): Incompatible Thought: Legacy and its Recursivity

北藝大博班實驗室2022系列演講II 【不相容的思想:遺產及其遞歸】 許煜訪台系列講座 〖Incompatible Thought: Legacy and its Recursivity〗 時間:2022年12月5日、6日、7日,14:00-17:00 地點:國立臺北藝術大學 基進講堂(圖書館3F,入口位於圖書館正門前石階左側) 講題:〈斯蒂格勒與後歐洲哲學〉、〈何謂亞洲?一個提問〉、〈機器與戰爭〉 報名連結:https://forms.gle/hqojhwcUHYd1HRGV6 (由於場地座位有限,煩請填寫) 「我不會說新的技術思想必然出自亞洲,而非歐洲,但我相信這類新思想只會出現在思想體系之間的不相容,因為兩者間的不相容造就出思想自身的個體化,同時避開從屬與支配關係。然而歐洲是否對此做好了準備?對我來說,再次闡明今天哲學、技術和地緣政治學之間的關係極為重要,然而今天我們仍然缺乏思考。」(21世紀的控制論 –—《遞歸與偶然》 洛文克訪談許煜) “One does not inherit a

Slide Slide Slide Slide Slide Slide Slide
Go toTop