Dialogues in Philosophy and Technology Research Seminar V (19 Jan 2022) Anna Longo: Predictive Technology vs. Prophetic Techne

December 7, 2021

Dialogues in Philosophy and Technology
Research Seminar V

Anna Longo: Predictive Technology vs. Prophetic Techne
In dialogue with Yuk Hui

Wednesday, 19 January 2022
13:00-15:00 CET / 20:00-22:00 HKT
Facebook Event
Online Event: Register to join via Zoom

Heidegger claims that the essence of technology is our destiny as a mode of revealing. Accordingly, scientific knowledge is not the cause of technological development but the consequence of the technical provocation of beings. Scientific hypotheses are not mere expectations about future occurrences but they are based on experimental settings through which natural systems are technically constrained to behave predictably, allowing for efficient use to obtain the desired results. This has been made explicit by logical empiricism under the assumption that the truth of scientific hypotheses depends on the logical implication between premises (evidence) and consequences (predictions). Rather than asking why we should expect the persistence of observed regularities (metaphysical question), we should ground knowledge on the practices that have been regularly employed and that have been shaping the use of scientific terms and concepts. This move opens up to the possibility of developing AI as an automatic calculation of the truth value of inductive inferences (the first to do so was Ray Solomonoff, Rudolf Carnap’s PhD student).

Considering the debate opposing Heidegger and Carnap, it is clear that while the latter aims to exclude from the field of acceptable knowledge any metaphysical use of empty concepts, the former blames this exclusion as the extreme danger to which technology exposes us, i.e. the absolutization of its mode of revealing. The dangerous consequence of this absolutization is not only the reduction of human beings to exploitable resources, but more fundamentally, the dismissal of freedom, conceived as the capacity of accessing truth as ‘essence’, or destiny.

In this talk I am going to explore the reasons why Heidegger considers poiesis as a specific method for enquiring on this not rationally acceptable truth: the ‘essence’ of reality as metaphysical destiny. I am going to suggest that, in order to fully understand Heidegger’s proposal for resisting the absolutization of technological enframing, we have to take into account Alexander Baumgarten’s aesthetics. This will allow me to show how techne – artistic praxis or poiesis – can still save us from the danger of being reduced to mere resources of information for the autonomous evolution of AI. I’ll show how esthetic knowledge consists in prophesying on our destiny, a destiny that escapes any possible scientifically acceptable prediction.

Anna Longo (Ph.D Panthéon-Sorbonne University) is a philosopher. She is directing the programme, Technologies of Time at Collège International de Philosophie and has been teaching at University Paris 1 and the California Institute of the Arts. She has been invited keynote speaker in conferences all over the world, she has been contributing to peer reviewed journals and international anthologies. Her forthcoming book, “The Game of Induction: Automatic knowledge production and philosophical reflection,” explores the progressive affirmation of the game theoretic conception of knowing that constitute the paradigm for algorithmic learning and contemporary AI; at the same time, it proposes to consider aesthetics as a form of knowledge that cannot be reduced to the former and that operates within its own horizon of truth.


About the series

The Dialogues on Philosophy and Technology seminar series is initiated by the Cosmotechnics/Critical AI research project, supported by the City University of Hong Kong in collaboration with the Research Network for Philosophy and Technology. The series running from Fall/Spring 2021/22 features talks and workshops with leading scholars in the philosophy of technology and aims to address urgent questions on philosophy and technology today.

Upcoming events include seminars with Henning Schmidgen (22 Feb), Andrew Feenberg (16 March), Luciana Parisi (20 April), and Carl Mitcham (25 May). Follow our Facebook Page or sign-up to our newsletter to stay up-to-date on upcoming events.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Previous Story

Symposium (7-19 Dec 2021) Art, Technology and Philosophy Lecture Series and Symposium: Departing from the Microcosmos

Next Story

Book Talk (26 Jan 2022): Continental Philosophy of Technoscience by Hub Zwart

Latest from Events

Lectures (5th-7th Dec 2022): Incompatible Thought: Legacy and its Recursivity

北藝大博班實驗室2022系列演講II 【不相容的思想:遺產及其遞歸】 許煜訪台系列講座 〖Incompatible Thought: Legacy and its Recursivity〗 時間:2022年12月5日、6日、7日,14:00-17:00 地點:國立臺北藝術大學 基進講堂(圖書館3F,入口位於圖書館正門前石階左側) 講題:〈斯蒂格勒與後歐洲哲學〉、〈何謂亞洲?一個提問〉、〈機器與戰爭〉 報名連結:https://forms.gle/hqojhwcUHYd1HRGV6 (由於場地座位有限,煩請填寫) 「我不會說新的技術思想必然出自亞洲,而非歐洲,但我相信這類新思想只會出現在思想體系之間的不相容,因為兩者間的不相容造就出思想自身的個體化,同時避開從屬與支配關係。然而歐洲是否對此做好了準備?對我來說,再次闡明今天哲學、技術和地緣政治學之間的關係極為重要,然而今天我們仍然缺乏思考。」(21世紀的控制論 –—《遞歸與偶然》 洛文克訪談許煜) “One does not inherit a

Slide Slide Slide Slide Slide Slide Slide
Go toTop